CONTINUING OUR DISCUSSION, PART 2

It will always be dominant! Now, if all people living on the earth were once all black; that means that at one point in the history of this planet; only the dominant gene trait existed in the human kingdom. So, for tens of thousands of years, blacks lived in Africa, and there were only black humans who possessed this dominant gene trait producing offspring. Two black humans who possess the dominant gene can only produce a child which will also have this black dominant gene, and, under these conditions, they could never produce a child which did not have this dominant gene: Because it is impossible for the dominant gene to mutate on its own. This, then, being a scientific fact: Once these black people left Africa carrying the dominant gene with them: They would have continued to produce offspring exhibiting the dominant gene trait – unless!
The only way – and I emphasize the only way – a change could occur to the type of offspring these black people would produce; would be due to another gene type being introduced into their gene pool. Below is a gene chart that explains the other gene type that exist on the earth today.

DOMINANT AND RECESSIVE CHARACTERISTICS

Characteristics in the left-hand column dominate over those characteristics listed in the right-hand column.

DOMINANT TRAITS
RECESSIVE TRAITS

eye coloring
brown eyes
grey, green, hazel, blue eyes

vision
normal visionnormal visionnormal visionnormal vision
farsightedness, nearsightedness, night blindness, color blindness*

hair
dark hair, non-red hair, curlyhair, full head of hair, normal hairline
blonde, light, red hairred hairstraight hairbaldness*widow's peak

facial features
dimples, unattached earlobes, no freckles, broad lips
no dimples, attached earlobes, freckles, thin lips

appendages
normal number, normal digits, normal digits, normal joints, normal proportion, normal thumb, normal joints
extra digits, fused digits, short digits, fingers lack 1 joint, limb dwarfing, clubbed thumb, double-jointedness

other
immunity to poison ivy, normal pigmented skin, normal blood clotting, normal hearing, normal hearing and speaking,normal- no PKU
susceptibility to poison ivy, albinism, hemophilia*congenital deafness, deaf mutism, phenylketonuria (PKU)

As we can see from the chart above: all the characteristics that make the black human are the dominant gene traits. These traits are in the left column of this chart. In the column on the right we now see what is called the recessive traits. We know that the dominant gene was once the only gene trait found in those humans that originated from Africa, which were the original people living on the earth. So, then, if what made the original people who live on the earth black was this dominant gene, which is, in essence, the result of Melanin being present in the black human: How is there now a recessive gene, not only on the earth, but now found in the human gene pool? Where on earth can the traits of the recessive gene be predominantly found? Before we can receive answers to these questions; we need to understand something about these two different gene types. In the book, MELANIN: THE CHEMICAL KEY TO BLACK GREATNESS, By Carol Barnes, pages 22-23. The author demonstrates the racial traits of individual types due to Melanin or lack of Melanin found in each individual group. Since all races originated from the black African leaving Africa; I feel, unlike the author, that the black type should have come first. So, in the individual types I will present from her book; I will present the black types first and then the other types.

TYPE 6 – These individuals are BLACK in color and include
AFRICANS (EGYPTIANS, ETHIOPIANS, NIGERIANS, ETC.)
AMERICAN BLACKS and AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINES!
Their eyes and hair are black!
They virtually have no incidence of skin cancer!
They show skin aging after the age of 50-60 years.

TYPE 5 – These individuals are brown-skinned and include Mexicans, Indians, Malaysians, Puerto Ricans, and other Spanish speaking people.
They produce moderate to high levels of Melanin.
Their eyes and hair are deep brown or black.
They show aging after the age of 50.
They seldom develop skin or other organ cancers.

TYPE 4 – These individuals are whites who are lightly tan and include Japanese, Chinese, Italian, Greeks, Spanish, and Red Indians.
They produce moderate levels of Melanin.
They show a moderate risk of developing skin or other organ cancer.

TYPE 3 – These individuals are white and produce moderate to low levels of Melanin.
They have blond, brunette or lightly pigmented hair.
They show a moderate to high risk of developing skin or other organ cancer.
They show skin aging by the age of 30-40 years.

TYPE 2 – These individuals are white and produce very low levels of Melanin.
They have hazel or blue eyes.
They have red or blond hair.
They often have freckled skin.
They are very prone to developing skin cancer.
They show skin aging early in life, between 25-30 years.

TYPE 1 – These individuals are white and cannot produce Melanin.
They have blue eyes, blond or red hair, white skin and often have freckles.
They have a Celtic background (Irish, Scottish, Welsh).
They are most prone to developing melanoma and other types of skin and organ cancer.
They show skin aging early in life between the ages of 25-30 years.

What this author has done for us is to demonstrate that the dominant gene trait (TYPE 6) is at one end of the spectrum, while the recessive gene trait (TYPE 1) is at the opposite end of the spectrum. This should mean, and in fact it does mean, that these two different gene types have different points of origin. And, that the other types (2,3,4, and 5) are a mixture of these two types. In other word: All people were blacks living in Africa; some of these blacks left Africa and encountered a new, never before seen, gene type. They had intercourse with those of this gene type, and produced offspring who would exhibit both the dominant gene and the recessive gene to varying degrees. Now, doesn't this explanation as to how there became different races on the planet make much more sense then to believe that two people of the same race would start to produce offspring of a different race just because they left Africa? This explanation would also be perfectly in line with the laws of gene mutation as was expressed in the article titled, “Managing Recessive Genes,” concerning the mating of beef cattle in the April 1, 2009 publication, THE BRANGUS JOURNAL:

“To get a better understanding of the expression of these recessive genes, we will start with a brief review of basic genetics. Individuals inherit half of their genes from the sire and half from the dam—we all know that. At a more basic level, an individual carries two alleles (alleles are different forms of a gene) at each specific location on the bovine genome. One allele was inherited from the sire and one from the dam. As such those alleles occur in pairs and an individual could inherit the same identical allele at both locations or could inherit different alleles. For a simple recessive allele to be expressed, the individual must have 2 copies of that allele. If there are not two identical copies of that recessive allele, the dominant allele will override the recessive allele. Just as in the case of the red allele, for a beef animal to be red, that animal must have two copies of the red allele. This is the case for all recessive genes whether they are detrimental or not. Going one step further, an individual will be black no matter whether they have 2 black alleles, or 1 black and 1 red allele (animals with one copy of the black and 1 copy of the red gene are known as “carriers” or “heterozygous”). In the absence of any new mutations, the mating of two animals both of which have two copies of the black allele, will always result in a black colored individual. However, if two black colored individuals each of whom carries a red allele are mated (heterozygous black animals), there is a 25% chance that the offspring will be red. This rule is the same no matter the recessive characteristic of concern. Additionally, if we were to mate one individual that has two copies of the black gene with another animal that is a carrier of the red gene, the result will be nothing but black offspring. This, too, is true for all recessive characteristics. Just to reiterate, the mating of an individual carrying a particular recessive allele to an individual that does not carry that recessive allele, will never result in the expression of that recessive characteristic.”

Even in the animal kingdom, as is the case with these beef cattle, two animals possessing the dominant trait will only produce offspring exhibiting the dominant trait, and can only produce a mutated offspring if the recessive trait is present in both individuals. But, Richard, the question of why there is now a recessive gene in the human gene pool still has not been answered: Nor has an answer been provided as to why this information has been kept hidden from the rest of mankind. Why have those who are now responsible for information being disseminated to the world prevented this information from ever being discovered? The answer to both these questions will be provided when we continue our discussion.

ON 05-14-09 CONTINUING OUR DISCUSSION

Richard, I'm glad to hear back from you. It's good to have questions about something that does not make sense to you yet. That shows that the mind is working on trying to resolve the conflict this new information has presented. I will do my part to help you grasp these new concepts. So, lets take each one of the issues you bring up one by one. The dominant gene pair color for beef cattle is Black! All the other colors brown, red, yellow (blond), and white are from the recessive gene pairs. When two dominant gene pair (Black) cattle mate, they will only produce a black color calf. If a beef cow that has the dominant gene pair (Black) cow mate with any of the other cows that have the recessive gene pairs (brown, red, yellow (blond), and white) only; then this calf will be black also. If two cows that have a dominant gene and a recessive gene as pairs mate; then they will produce a black calf seventy-five percent of the time, and a calf that has only the recessive gene pair twenty-five percent of the time (albinism in humans). In order to guarantee to have recessive gene pair (brown, red, yellow (blond), and white), these cattle can only mate with each other, and they must both have the exact same recessive gene pair to produce a calf that has the same gene pairs as they do. I hope this gives you a better understanding of how the dominant gene and the recessive genes relate to one another. I know that I sent this information already, but it is vitally important that you see this for yourself. Whether its the human kingdom or the animal kingdom; the dominant gene (black) will never mutate. It will always remain dominant, and can only produce altered gene types by being introduced to a recessive gene. This should be conclusive proof, then, that the Africans that left Africa did not begin to produce children of different races simply because they experienced less direct sunlight and different climate changes. There was another gene type existing on the earth, and this gene type exhibited the recessive genes traits.

So, how did the recessive genes enter into the human kingdom? We know that the dominant gene is the gene that produces the traits of the black human, and that these black humans were the first to appear on the earth. They lived in Africa producing only offspring that exhibited the dominant gene traits. These facts, as just stated, are not in dispute and are universally accepted by all scientist that have examined the evidence, and as we already know from the information provided in the letters: Approximately fifty thousand years ago some of these Africans left Africa and traveled to other parts of the world. So, we are talking about a very long, long time ago. It was during this time period that they would have encountered those who exhibited the recessive genes traits. Before we begin to unravel this mystery of the origin of the recessive genes; I would like to first pause here so I could make a comment about another concern you brought up in the email you sent me.

When you said that you have already tried to share this information that you are learning with others; only to be disappointed that black people don't want to believe anything good about themselves. This experience seemed to have left you down, and I was a little concern that this revelation was going to permanently discourage you. So, I was relieved to receive your email today stating that you now understand that this is not a fight for the weak. You are now experiencing what I have experienced for many years now. The letters I wrote; originally were free. There weren't always a cost placed on them. All my friends, and this included some of those who were in the church I belonged to back then, got to read the original letters for free. After reading the original letters; many of them haven't spoken to me in years. Some would even cross the street if they saw me coming. Mind you, all I did was to have the audacity to write letters that stated we were the true people of the bible. I didn't just state it, though, I proved it. Just as I'm now proving who are the true Gentiles on the earth; I proved in the letters who are the true people of the bible. But, regardless to how much documented material providing conclusive evidence is put forth; most blacks will reject out right the notion that they are the true people of the bible. And, most will reject the facts outline in this discussion of who are the Gentiles as well.
It took me awhile to come to understand that this message is not suppose to convert most of the people who hear it. When I first began to understand this truth, I thought that blacks would shout for joy at hearing this message. I honestly believed that we would finally unite as a people and claim what is rightfully ours. I thought that by placing a price on the letters; only those who truly wanted to be free would read the letters, and we would use the money raised from the web site to purchase land in Africa where we could live according to the laws found in the bible, and prepare the way for the returning black king who is going to establish a kingdom here on earth.

Now, don't get me wrong; the bible actually states that this is going to happen, and it is most certainly going to happen: But I just thought that it was going to happen sooner, and with a much greater turnout than there has been thus far. I've come to understand what is the true purpose of this message, and if you are serious about being a part of this work; then you are going to have to understand as well. Although, most blacks have been deceived into accepting a white god and savior, and will reject any notion that they were punished for rejecting their true Black Creators: Whites on the other hand, at least most of them, know that what is stated in the letters is true. I know this because many of them have purchased the letters. In fact, to date, more whites have purchased the letters than blacks, and not one of them have ever written me back claiming the information I have written is false. It's only most blacks that would believe that such a ridiculous story that would place whites as the native born rulers over ancient Egypt – is true!

So, Richard, this message is suppose to be a warning to the present rulers of governments and religions that the time of their deceptive rule over the earth has finally come to an end. It will never be in our control who hears, proves, and accepts this message. That responsibility the Two Creators (YHWH) has left up to THEM to determine. Yes, preach the truth, but leave the rest to THEM. If we do this, then we have fulfilled:

Mtt.24:14; “And this message of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come.”

Now, lets identify where the recessive genes predominantly are found on the earth. If we do that, then we can determine what it was that introduced the recessive genes into the black human gene pool. As I have already stated; the dominant gene trait is what makes the black human. This dominant gene once was the only gene found in the black human, because all people living on the earth were once only black. Upon leaving Africa; those Africans encountered those who carried the recessive genes traits. If one were to carefully consider what are the characteristics of the recessive genes; then it would become obvious where on earth are the recessive genes trait predominantly found, and once this is established; the origin of the recessive genes can also be determined. In fact, I have already demonstrated where the recessive genes are predominantly found. When we read from the article, “Managing Recessive Genes,” this discussion on the mating of beef cattle took us into the kingdom where the recessive genes are predominant. The recessives genes are the dominant traits of the animal kingdom. All the characteristics of the recessive genes are found in the animal kingdom. It is a simple observation; all one would have to do is to open their eyes and look! The fur of mammals of the animal kingdom come in different colors (Black, brown, red, yellow (blond), and white). The pupils (eyes) of the animal kingdom also come in an array of colors (grey, green, hazel, and blue). The skin of the animal kingdom (once the fur is removed) is white for the most part with some exceptions. Now return to the gene chart above and look once again at the recessive genes traits. So, this is not my opinion; this is a scientific fact, and I'm just stating the facts. The fact is that there are humans today who carry the recessive genes, which originated from the animal kingdom. These humans today are those of European descent or Caucasoid (whites).

If I were to just use my words only and the bible; most people would have an excuse to dismiss and deny the information I have put forth, but when a published author has already documented how the Africans encountered this sub-human who over a very long period of time would become the Caucasians we see today: Then, this leaves very little room for denial.

The origins of the Neanderthals are, naturally, in dispute; some anthropologists lean toward the theory that they were a uniquely European development, while others think that they may have come into Europe from the East (but without pointing to any known human population from which they could have come). It seems fairly certain that, before the last European Ice Age began about 100,000 years ago, the Neanderthals co-existed with more modern looking people represented by the Fontechevade and Krapina people. CHOSEN PEOPLE FROM THE CAUCASUS, By Michael Bradley, pg. 56-57

There existed a sub-human creature on the earth. This half man, half beast origin was that of Europe and Asia. It was this Neanderthal that the people of Africa encountered upon entering the continent of Europe.

About 40,000 years ago, a temporary, but intense waring of the European climate known as the Gottwieg Interstadial occurred. People who had formerly lived in Europe and who had been waiting out the Ice Age in Saharan Africa, descendants of the Fontecchvade and Krapina people, migrated back into Europe. One supposes that these returning migrants fought with the resident Neanderthals in some places, but also inter-bred with them...These were “Neanderthal-like” people by this time, and Carleton Coon gave them the label “Neanderthal-Caucasoids.” CHOSEN PEOPLE FROM THE CAUCASUS, By Michael Bradley, pg. 61-62

Since this white author has had the courage to reveal such shocking truth about the origin of the Caucasian people; I'm willing, at this point, to give him the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps at the publication of his work; all the facts concerning the DNA research into the origin of the races had not yet been made available to him. One thing, as a result of this research, that can be stated with absolute certainty is that approximately 50,000 years ago it was Africans, and not these so-called Europeans, that left Africa (at least) and entered into Europe where they encountered these Neanderthals. This DNA research now leaves no doubt about this fact.

But it hardly matters. The point is that Neanderthals ruled Europe exclusively during the Ice Age: either once or twice there were warm periods when returning peoples arrived in Europe and inter-bred with the Neanderthals; once or twice when the weather turned cold again, Neanderthal cold-survival traits became selected again (and then the end of the Ice Age about 10-15,000 years ago or less when southerly peoples began to migrate into Europe and mix with Neanderthal and Neanderthal-Caucasoid populations). Modern Europeans are the result – modern “Caucasians,” white men. CHOSEN PEOPLE FROM THE CAUCASUS, By Michael Bradley, pg. 62-63

We now have a chronological record of how there came to be people living on the earth with white skin. All that is needed now to be provided is a description of the Neanderthal to see if this was, indeed, the origin of the recessive genes traits entering into the black human kingdom.
If these kaptar descriptions and traditions are to be trusted at all, they not only lend support to the above, but add to our picture of Neanderthals; their fur color was predominantly and commonly a deep red. Their head hair (or fur) could be curly (“like a woolly fleece”). They could speak a “primitive language.” CHOSEN PEOPLE FROM THE CAUCASUS, By Michael Bradley, pg. 75-76

Judging from the wording of the quote above; the predominant color of the Neanderthals fur was red. This color red, as we shall see once we return our discussion back to the bible, is a vital clue to identifying the story of this Neanderthal. But, it is clear from other places in this book that the color red was not the only color found among the Neanderthals.

The names might change from place to place, but the descriptions Khakhlov gathered were remarkably consistent. It was a short, but very massively built, human being. It had a big head. Females had huge hips and huge, pendulous breast. Females and young ones traveled in fairly large groups, but the males seemed to be solitary. They could range in color from black-furred to almost blond-furred, but the most common color was a sort of rich mahogany. Their fur, or hair , was very profuse (except on the breasts of the females) and was usually straight. However, the hair of the head was often curly. Like a woolly mahogany fleece. They had large, protruding faces and very large noses with large, elongated nostrils. They lived in very remote valleys high up in the mountains, but they were not at all rare. CHOSEN PEOPLE FROM THE CAUCASUS, By Michael Bradley, pg. 71

It should be considered nothing less then remarkable that after all these many centuries have past; the European people still exhibit these traits that identify their origin. The European people still have the exact hair colors that were attribute to the Neanderthals and to that of the animal kingdom; black, brown (brunette), red, and yellow (blond).

There you have it Richard: The truth has just been set before you, and although this should be definitive proof; don't be mislead. There will still be others that will deny and dispute all the evidence I have put forth here. You will have to decide for yourself if you are going to continue to be lead by unscientific and unproven theories about the origin of the people with white skin - Caucasoid, or if you are going to be among the few who are strong enough to take back our true Identity, history, and heritage!

Because, if this information is true, which it is, then this means that there can be no truth to the bible the Europeans have forced on the rest of mankind. And, that they have taken ownership of something that is not rightfully theirs. Which, means that the true owners must be identified, so they can reclaim ownership of the documents of their history. When we continue, we are going to finish exposing the Gentiles in the bible, so there can be no doubt as to who are the original owners of history and the bible.